Run Rabbit Run Breaks New Ground


From its inception, the Run Rabbit Run 100 has strived to be an innovator in the sport of ultrarunning. Race Director Fred Abramowitz is something of a visionary; he imagines the state of our sport many years into the future while trying to promote and support our top athletes as much as possible in the here and now.

The most disruptive aspect of Run Rabbit Run happened right from the start, with the creation of substantial prize purses for top finishers, distributed evenly among men and women. The race offers the highest prize purse of any ultramarathon in North America; this year, the men’s and women’s winners are guaranteed at least $12,500.

This year the race introduces a whole new category of competition and prize money with the debut of the Rabbit Cup. It’s a competition consisting of 10 teams who each pay $10,000 to buy a slot in the contest plus accommodations for the team prior to the race. Each team will consist of three runners, with one male and one female runner’s times in the 100-mile event combined to determine the fastest team time. First prize for the winning team will be $50,000, with second awarded $20,000. Third through sixth places will earn $15,000, $10,000, $5,000 and $3,000, respectively.

In addition to the $100,000 Rabbit Cup purse money awarded to the fastest teams, all runners will also be eligible for the event’s existing $65,000 individual prize money. For example, if the female winner is also on the winning Rabbit Cup team, she will earn the $12,500 for the individual win plus her share of the $50,000 Rabbit Cup prize money. It could end up to be a very lucrative day for one or two fortunate elites.

Teams that purchase a slot do not need to name their runners until September 1, which gives them time to see who is racing well or who is injured through the summer race season, and then put their best possible team on the start line on September 14. The race committee has been working with domestic as well as international teams in the buildup to the race, and the Rabbit Cup should offer a new and exciting component to what is rapidly becoming one of the premier mountain 100-milers in America.

As for the state of our sport in the future, Abramowitz has a vision for how that might develop as well – and he has graciously put his thoughts on paper for us to share. We found his ideas to be interesting and thought-provoking, so we’re curious to hear your thoughts at the end.

A Blueprint for Sponsors of Ultrarunning and How to Improve Our Sport

By Fred Abramowitz

Today’s media consumer is inundated with virtually limitless entertainment options. There are hundreds of television channels, digital streaming, on-demand viewing, YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, podcasts and countless social media outlets, all competing for consumer attention. Sponsors of today’s athletic events, a model based on “counting eyeballs,” must compete with all these entertainment entities, and this is as true for those sponsoring ultra events as it is for any other sport.

Because ultrarunning is still a fringe sport – albeit one whose profile has increased enormously in recent years – opportunities for growth are great. What has not yet occurred is a clear sense of how sponsors and those who care about our sport can take advantage of its inevitable growth and direct that growth in a positive way. This involves looking beyond the “banners at as many races as we can” approach that characterizes much of today’s ultrarunning sponsorship and also involves looking beyond the “let’s not change anything” mindset that characterizes many of the old-time participants. Our sport is growing and change is inevitable. All of us who love this sport must begin viewing ultrarunning in the context of the larger sports and entertainment markets.

Consider the following:

The innermost circle represents the die-hard fans of ultrarunning – those who avidly follow the sport, know our participants, and will stay up and track a 100-mile race through the night. They subscribe to Ultrarunner Podcast, iRunFar, and UltraRunning magazine (which has a paid circulation of approximately 10,000) and may attend a race as a spectator. Most of these fans are ultrarunners themselves. The number of these die-hard fans is quite small, probably numbering less a few thousand.

The next inner circle represents the broader ultra and trail running community. They are either ultra or trail runners themselves, and while they don’t fanatically follow the sport, they may be familiar with the names of the elite runners and the major races and will watch and follow an event if it’s presented properly. They enter trail races and frequently run off-road. While their number is larger than that of the die-hard fan, their number is still fairly small, in the range of 50-100,000. Their number is growing rapidly.

The third circle represents the greater running community, the people for whom running forms a significant part of their lifestyle. They may subscribe to Runner’s World (which has a U.S. circulation of approximately 700,000), and they consistently participate in races. Their number is substantial; about 550,000 individuals in the United States ran a marathon in 2016, and over 16 million ran some form of organized road race. They are increasingly being drawn to ultra and trail running as an alternative to running on roads and as they seek the new frontiers beyond the marathon distance.

Finally, the outermost ring, by far the largest, represents the general sports fan, the “sports junkie.” They will watch any competitive sports event of even casual interest to them, whether the major professional sports, the Olympics, World Cup, Tour de France (estimates as to how many watch the Tour vary from 500 million to over 3 billion worldwide), to the Ironman World Championships. If they come across a Spartan Race or Tough Mudder event on television, they’ll pause to watch it.

To date ultrarunning has marketed itself primarily to the innermost circle – the die-hard fans of the sport – but has scarcely attempted to engage those even in the second circle. As for the outermost two circles, the sport has more or less ignored those potential new fans who have yet to form any connection to ultrarunning. Those outer rings constitute the untapped opportunities for sponsors.

Consider the third outermost ring – the millions of Americans who consider themselves “runners.” They purchase millions of running shoes, socks, apparel and other running-related products. They belong to banks, join health clubs, purchase insurance, buy cars, backpack, camp and have far above the average median household and disposable incomes. At one time millions of them tuned in to watch Bill Rodgers and Frank Shorter run the Boston, New York City and Olympic Marathons, and track and field was featured regularly on network television. But today, with the ascendance of African runners who dominate road racing, and with track and field plagued by never-ending drug scandals, Americans lack the running “heroes” they can relate to.

Ultrarunning, with its cast of young, attractive, and wholesome athletes, perfectly fills the void. Most of our elite runners are well educated and articulate. A few are brash and outspoken and do well on the “cool” scale, while others are self effacing and modest. As a rule, ultrarunners are uniformly likeable, they disdain cheating and rarely get in trouble with the law. Most know that competing in their sport can be an unpredictable endeavor and almost all of them have had bad days – sometimes spectacularly bad ones – and they show good sportsmanship. And many ultra events offer breathtaking scenery in interesting venues to rival that of the Tour de France.

Fifteen years ago, NASCAR, Professional Bull Riding and professional poker were fringe sports, with virtually no casual followers. Today millions watch those events, despite the fact that the actual number of participants is miniscule. Ultrarunning can learn from these events: it needs new ideas, new ways of attracting the already committed runners as well as the casual sports fan to our terrific sport.

One key necessity is that races need to be competitive and dramatic; there are hundreds of 100-mile events, but those that offer competitive fields are a handful at most. People ask why Run Rabbit Run offers prize money – we do it not merely because it’s good for the sport, but also because prize money attracts competitive fields and competitive fields attract interest – which is good for our sponsors and our communities and the charities that benefit from our race.

Secondly, our sport needs to promote the remarkable accomplishments of everyday runners, and not just the elites. The late Jim McKay of ABC Sports once said he could engage any fan in any sport if he could make the fan care about the participant – and there’s no better sport than ultrarunning to highlight the struggle of individuals. Our sport consists of single mothers, cancer survivors, survivors of addiction and abuse; every event consists of dozens of individual stories that make for a fascinating backdrop and we need to learn to better promote those stories. Think of the human-interest stories you see during every Olympics; ultrarunning can match or exceed the dramatic impact of the best of those.

A recent YouTube video provides an excellent illustration: REI Presents: How to Run 100 Miles by Brendan Leonard features two novices attempting their first 100-mile run, at the 2017 Run Rabbit Run 100-miler. The video is funny, informative, deeply inspiring…and it features nothing about the elites who were competing in the event. It is an “everyman’s” perspective on what it takes to run 100 miles. To date the video has garnered almost 3.5 million views on YouTube alone. Very few of those viewers are in the “innermost circle” of ultrarunning; they represent the casual sports fan who presents rich opportunities to the right sponsor who commits to marketing our sport in a media-savvy manner.

We are only at the beginning of our sport’s growth. Those of us who love it need to accept its growth and harness it to preserve what’s great about it. If we don’t, someone else will. And we may not like the way that looks.

Fred Abramowitz is the managing partner of the law firm of Abramowitz, Franks and Olsen, and the race director of the Run, Rabbit, Run 50 and 100 Mile Endurance Runs. At age 66 he has completed well over 100 ultra marathons, including dozens of hundred milers and marathons.

Call for questions or comments:

  1. Would you like to see ultrarunning events featured on television shows in a similar manner as Spartan Races? Why or why not?
  2. Do you think there is potential for ultrarunning to be a mainstream sport followed by millions of fans?
  3. Should the ultrarunning community intentionally strive to package and expand marketing of our sport from within, or wait for outside entities to “discover” us?
  4. Are you in favor of corporate sponsors such as insurance companies, automobile companies, cable networks, or government agencies entering our sport, if it meant increased prize money and exposure for our top athletes?
  5. Would the presence of professional film crews at races influence your decision about whether or not to enter that race?
  6. Could you see an ultramarathon as an Olympic event?

About Author

Donald is a physical therapist, California native, barefoot aficionado, and father of three with more than 25 years of experience in endurance sports. He was a collegiate rower at UCLA, then dabbled in marathons and Ironman-distance triathlons before falling in love with ultras in the early 2000s. His favorite locations to run include Marin County, CA, and the Sierra Nevada mountains, and he loves exploring America's National Parks. When he's not training for ultramarathons, he enjoys hiking or slacklining with his family in Monterey County, CA.


  1. I think it’s past time for ultra’s to have a larger presence in mainstream media. There are all kinds of fringe sports that are boring to watch, happen indoors, and don’t offer particularly compelling stories that have professionals that can make more money than ultramarathoners because of the exposure and corporate sponsorships. While part of the beauty of racing is going out in the mountains and being semi-secluded while competing, I don’t think that means that a few races shouldn’t have big followings and sponsorships (like the Tour de France or Ironman Championship).

  2. First, I want to say that I appreciate Fred and his contributions to the sport of ultra running. I can only imagine the amount of tireless work and effort that goes into putting on an event such as Run Rabbit Run. So thank you Fred and respect where respect is due.

    I just want to point a few things out and make an argument for why I think Fred is a bit off base.. and how this is NOT the approach that is going to grow or promote our sport. It sure sounds romantic, and for the most part that’s all it really is.. romantic. But the money just isn’t there.

    This year New Balance decided to no longer sponsor the Leadville Trail 100. The LT100 has been around for over 35 years, was featured in the New York Times Best Selling Book “Born to Run,” there is rumor of a major motion picture film, and was ultimately purchased by Lifetime Fitness for MILLIONS. When you consider the draw of sponsoring the LT100 and the entire Leadville series, and all the ROI and exposure that comes along with it, it makes you wonder why New Balance decided to walk away. Not only that, but NB had named a shoe after Leadville, a shoe that is no longer in production. Based on first hand conversations I have had with NB reps in my region and at their Northeast HQ, I learned that they walked away from sponsoring LT100 because they are walking away from being involved in Ultra Running altogether. Their reasoning is because they just can’t justify the ROI (return on investment) in a sport that is still so niche. They’re returning their primary focus towards road running and trail running will just be an aside.

    NB isn’t the first company to walk away from us. Just last year Pearl Izumi ended their run brand altogether, road and trail. PI too had an ultra team and sponsored many races. They walked because they too could not justify the ROI. Recently, La Sportiva paid the $20,000 to be a sponsor of Leadville, a company with a Colorado office that to our knowledge hasn’t put money into the Rabbit Cup, this says a lot.

    When RRR first decided to have a prize purse prior to the event’s first year, Fred told everyone that the purse would be $100,000. Since then there hasn’t been one time that the purse has reached that amount. Now we have a new and secondary prize purse where another $100,000 is promised. To our knowledge, RRR isn’t yet close to acquiring 10 entities willing to shell out the $10,000 to field a team. I again bring you to ROI… why would a company pay $10,000 to field a team of runners when the company really receives ZERO Return on Investment for their $10k? They don’t get that money back when their runners win. They don’t get a share of it when their runners win. The winning runners get all of it and rightfully so, that’s how prize money works. But are we really to believe that a run brand is going to shell out $10k as a total give away? Fred stated that if they don’t get the 10 teams willing to pay the $10k.. then the Rabbit Cup doesn’t happen and all monies are refunded. This is ultimately what will happen with this publicity stunt.

    Name 5 companies that have this kind of money, are invested in ultra, who you think will actually pay it, and has a team of runners to field in the race. At first glance we can easily name Altra, Hoka One One, and La Sportiva. But La Sportiva already sunk their cash into Leadville, so they’re out. You can look to Nathan… perhaps. Ultimate Direction is another one folks will pop into their heads but they are now owned by the same parent company as the one who makes camping equipment for Walmart. What do you think the realistic chances of them fielding a team is? Have you found 5 companies yet? … If we struggle to find 5, how is RRR going to find 10? It’s the end of June, and the race happens in less than 3 months now. At this point, what elites are going to put their name out there to “race” for a large prize purse on few months concentrated training?

    There is no money in ultra. companies are more interested in getting their product into the hands of race participants, more than they are shelling out cash to the RD. Any RD who isn’t seeing this is living in a dream world that is more fantasy than reality. Ask ANY other Race Director about the landscape of sponsorships and they’ll tell you. Time for everyone to get real on this one..

  3. The team relay component of the RRR 100 is a great idea. It’s going to be fun to see the teams that get put together. I’ll be more engaged with the race as a result.