Average Finishing Times for 2014 UltraRunning Magazine 01/29/2015 UltraRunning Magazine 01/29/2015 FacebookTwitterEmail UltraRunning Magazine You may also like What’s Up in Ultra This Weekend — January... 01/26/2023 Review: Winter Glove Roundup 01/25/2023 Ultra Weekend Recap — January 22 01/22/2023 Rebecca Joyner 01/20/2023 What’s Up in Ultra This Weekend — January... 01/18/2023 Peterman and Dauwalter named 2022 UltraRunners of the... 01/18/2023 Herron and Walmsley named #2 2022 UltraRunners of... 01/17/2023 Jones and Hogan named #3 2022 UltraRunners of... 01/16/2023 Ultra Weekend Recap — January 15 01/15/2023 Review: Winter Running Jackets 01/15/2023 4 comments Scott Harber 01/29/2015 - 10:35 am I dont suppose you could make the raw data available? Marc Henn 01/29/2015 - 12:11 pm Would be interesting to also see the DNF rate for the various distances as well. Those are the people that finished but those are not all the people who raced. So what may look like an average time is above average if you count the DNFs. allanholtz 04/05/2016 - 12:24 pm Typically 66% of starters finish 100-mile races. That percentage does vary race to race and year to year. The Barkley (an extreme exception I admit) has a 2% finish rate with a 60 hour limit. Then some people who DNF do so because they timed out at an aid station and some because for various reasons they chose to quit with time remaining on the clock. Both reasons for DNF apply in spades at the Barkley also. I know, I’ve DNFed there 4 times. Majamäki 01/29/2015 - 3:40 pm Would really be interested in seeing the data, race times can vary by such a wide margin due to the elevation gain in races. At least we can use this as a gauge for the Shangri-La Marathon & Ultra http://shangri-la-marathon.com/ race this April. 8 to 10 hours cut off for 50k, but 18-hours for 100k might be to tight for some. Comments are closed.